Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 31 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill.
Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill
No, not of itself. I was going to go on to say that it will be done against the backdrop of the annual report that must be made to the Secretary of State and laid before Parliament, so that when the regulations come before Parliament, Parliament will have an opportunity to consider them in the context of the performance achieved. I should have thought that the commission would not want to revert to the experience of the early or mid-1990s, when a charging structure was in place on a more limited basis, I think, that could never be successfully implemented because there was no confidence in how the CSA was operating. That pretty much follows, but I do not want what I said to be misunderstood.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 698 c430GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Complaints Child support Children Contracts Contact orders Absent parents Contracts for services Child Support Agency Fees and charges Families ICT Information Maintenance Parents Poverty Parliamentary scrutiny Welfare tax credits Voluntary organisations Separation Children's centres Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
- Legislation
- Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:30:13 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_441616
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_441616
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_441616