Proceeding contribution from Lord Wedderburn of Charlton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Employment Bill [HL].
Employment Bill [HL]
I understand what my noble friend says, but we have already established that consent will include deemed consent. I suggest that our worries about that are added to our worries about the type of case where ““deemed to consent”” will operate. A worker who does not think that he has the national minimum wage award that he should have may be deemed to consent to a single-chairman hearing and that is the end of it. I do not suggest that single-chairman hearings always get it wrong, but I am suggesting, as I suggested that the very beginning of this afternoon's proceedings—
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 698 c486GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disciplinary proceedings Codes of practice ACAS Employment Industrial relations Employment Tribunals Service Industrial disputes Monitoring Surveillance Tribunals Trade unions Sick pay Grievance procedures
- Legislation
- Employment Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:26:15 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_442180
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_442180
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_442180