Proceeding contribution from Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 5 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill.
Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill
I understand that and the point is well taken. But how is the parent with care able to make a judgment about her next step, even if she has the right and title to move to a next step; either going for a variation or an appeal right away? There is a real risk that she will be short-changed. I have picked up on something else, but I do not want to stray into the next debate. Using data protection too early in all this worries me because the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005 has some right and proper protections for people’s records. Section 18 states that data can be provided where it is in the public interest to disclose under Section 20 of that Act. I hope that we are not going to start hiding behind confidentiality to deny parents with care the ability to make proper judgment about whether they have title to mount a variation.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 698 c512GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Child support Children Cooperation Arrears Child Support Agency Custody Liability Income Maintenance Parents Payments Overseas residence Self-employed Revenue and Customs Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
- Legislation
- Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:25:58 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_443073
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_443073
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_443073