Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 7 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill.


Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill

We might as well all go home. The debate has demonstrated that it is obviously essential that this new commission, CMEC, should make some of its own decisions for itself. However, I make the final point that, as demonstrated by the debate, leaving the commission in charge of the transition by itself is not safe. It is perfectly reasonable to get it to oversee and deploy the plan in the legislation, but we have had much bad experience of this transitional process. This is my final plea. I am encouraged by the Minister saying that he would think about the affirmative resolution procedure being used at parliamentary level, at least in the initial stages of this transfer. If we do not get this right, the organisation has no chance of success. It is carrying a package of legacy issues, which we all understand. However, the debate has been useful, even if it just demonstrates the complexity of the transfer process that we are facing. On that basis, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 18 agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c634GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Child support Children Debts Bank services Deductions Absent parents Custodial treatment Arrears Child Support Agency ICT Identity cards Interest charges Maintenance Personal income Parents Payments Passports Overseas residence Travel Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission Driving licences Administrative liability orders
Legislation
Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk