Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 7 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill.


Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill

moved Amendments Nos. 127 to 133: 127: Clause 21, page 11, line 32, leave out from ““which”” to ““order”” in line 33 and insert ““the deposit-taker at which an order is directed, the person against whom the order is made and (in the case of an order made in respect of a joint account) the other account-holders may apply to the Commission for it to review the”” 128: Clause 21, page 11, line 48, leave out ““current”” 129: Clause 21, page 11, line 50, leave out ““current”” 130: Clause 21, page 12, line 1, leave out ““may”” and insert ““shall”” 131: Clause 21, page 12, line 2, leave out ““magistrates’ court (or, in Scotland, to the sheriff)”” and insert ““court”” 132: Clause 21, page 12, line 8, leave out ““or (as the case may be) the sheriff”” 133: Clause 21, page 12, line 13, leave out from ““of”” to end of line 15 and insert ““the court to which the appeal under the regulations lies”” On Question, amendments agreed to. Clause 21, as amended, agreed to. Clause 22 [Lump sum deduction orders]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c657GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Child support Children Debts Bank services Deductions Absent parents Custodial treatment Arrears Child Support Agency ICT Identity cards Interest charges Maintenance Personal income Parents Payments Passports Overseas residence Travel Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission Driving licences Administrative liability orders
Legislation
Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk