Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 7 February 2008. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill.


Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill

There was no reference, in either of the interesting and valid points made, to proposed Section 39B(4) of the Child Support Act in the amendment: "““Before making an order under this section against a person, the Commission shall consider whether the person needs a travel authorisation in order to earn a living””." The instances quoted by the noble Lords, Lord Goodlad and Lord Skelmersdale, might include, for example, a visit to family overseas on medical grounds or a need for urgent medical treatment and so on. Would the noble Lords be satisfied if my noble friend felt that a possible compromise might be to extend the grounds in new subsection (4) to, for example, take medical grounds into account, rather than to seek to make all such applications go through the courts?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c668GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Travel ICT Children Debts Bank services Deductions Absent parents Custodial treatment Arrears Child Support Agency Identity cards Interest charges Maintenance Personal income Parents Payments Passports Overseas residence Driving licences Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission Administrative liability orders
Legislation
Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk