Proceeding contribution from Viscount Bledisloe (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 20 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Banking (Special Provisions) Bill.
Banking (Special Provisions) Bill
My Lords, the noble Lord referred, albeit fleetingly, to the sunset clause. Why should not the period of the sunset clause be a great deal shorter—say, one or two months? Is he worried that if it was so shortened, the fact that this is in reality a Hybrid Bill dressed up as a Public Bill would become too apparent?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 699 c196
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Accountability Administration Assets Banks Competition Building societies Bank of England Freedom of information Liability Government assistance Financial Services Authority Public bodies Mortgages Loans Staff Nationalisation Lloyds TSB Shares Shareholders Takeovers Northern Rock Granite Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Banking (Special Provisions) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 22:54:45 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_445960
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_445960
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_445960