Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Berkeley (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 March 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill.


Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill

I am grateful to my noble friend for that full answer. He mentioned that the contents of Network Rail’s licence were effectively covered by the contract between the Secretary of State and the infrastructure manager. I have two questions. First, does it cover safety and standards, stewardship within the licence holders’ network, environmental matters, timetabling and all the other things to do with Network Rail’s licence? Secondly, and most important, is it in the public domain or will it be in the public domain? Network Rail’s contract is very much in the public domain, which is appropriate. My noble friend referred to Section 17 and said that the ORR can direct High Speed 1 to enter into a contract, but Section 17(1) of the 1996 Act states that it specifically cannot do that. I am not quite sure what that means. Section 17(1) states: "““No directions under section 17(1) of the Railways Act 1993 … may be given to a rail link undertaker in relation to a rail link facility””." That is why I have suggested that the clause should be removed.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
699 c241GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Access Construction Channel tunnel Cooperation High Speed 1 line Finance Fees and charges Licensing EU law Infrastructure High speed trains Railway network Network Rail Regulation Subsidies Eurostar London and Continental Railways Office of Rail Regulation Waterloo Station
Legislation
Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk