Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 March 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill.


Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill

The points made by the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, are very pertinent. In the end, people and freight will use a system which is at market price. If it goes above market price, there will be a lot less traffic than would be the case if it were at market price. I would like the Minster to be fairly explicit in his response as to whether it is the Government’s intention to use this railway line and set prices which are reasonably attractive to both freight operators and passengers, or to set the prices high and squeeze whatever they can out of the people who can pay and, as it were, devil take the hindmost. It is important that this national asset is used for public benefit.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
699 c243GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Access Construction Channel tunnel Cooperation High Speed 1 line Finance Fees and charges Licensing EU law Infrastructure High speed trains Railway network Network Rail Regulation Subsidies Eurostar London and Continental Railways Office of Rail Regulation Waterloo Station
Legislation
Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk