Proceeding contribution from Lord Berkeley (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 March 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill.
Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill
Clause 5 concerns Section 56 of the 1996 Act, which is full of definitions. As all the other definitions effectively concern the construction of the link, and as we have already discussed the fact that there should not be a development agreement but that there should be another way of regulating and having licences instead for the link, there did not seem to be much point in having Section 56. However, I am sure that my noble friend will say that many things still need to be included and that it is just a tidying-up exercise following the previous discussion on the development agreement.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 699 c246GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Access Construction Channel tunnel Cooperation High Speed 1 line Finance Fees and charges Licensing EU law Infrastructure High speed trains Railway network Network Rail Regulation Subsidies Eurostar London and Continental Railways Office of Rail Regulation Waterloo Station
- Legislation
- Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:32:27 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_454337
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_454337
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_454337