Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 March 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill.


Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill

The clause amends the definition of ““development agreement”” which, as my noble friend has observed is in Section 56 of the Channel Tunnel Rail Link Act 1996. LCR designed and constructed HS1 in accordance with the terms of the development agreement that it signed with the Secretary of State in February 1996. That agreement contains the terms of the concession to operate the railway, which will continue post-construction. To reflect more clearly that the provisions of the 1996 Act referring to the development agreement continue to apply during the operational phase of the railway, this clause amends the definition of ““development agreement”” to include ““operation””. It does no more than that. There is not much else to say about that clause.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
699 c246-7GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Access Construction Channel tunnel Cooperation High Speed 1 line Finance Fees and charges Licensing EU law Infrastructure High speed trains Railway network Network Rail Regulation Subsidies Eurostar London and Continental Railways Office of Rail Regulation Waterloo Station
Legislation
Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk