Proceeding contribution from Baroness Barker (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 6 May 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health and Social Care Bill.
Health and Social Care Bill
moved Amendment No. 54A: 54A: Clause 16, page 8, line 39, at end insert— ““( ) The functions of the Commission in relation to health care acquired infections shall be adequately and separately funded by the Secretary of State.”” The noble Baroness said: We return to the subject of healthcare-acquired infections. This is a probing amendment about the new function that the CQC will have to ask whether resources will be made available to it to take on the additional work of monitoring healthcare-acquired infections. The reason for the amendment is twofold. It is undeniable that the Government attach a degree of political importance to the issue that far outweighs the importance of other matters, such as nutrition and so on. It is therefore highly likely that with the political imperative behind it, the commission may well find that, whatever it may think, it has very early in its life to devote the bulk of its resources to that. The amendment is intended to ensure that the new commission, especially during its formative period, is not so skewed by an emphasis on healthcare-acquired infections that it does not begin to set up standards of work in the other areas—particularly social care and mental health. Amendment No. 55A, which is also in this group, attempts to discover whether there will be consultation with people involved in social care on the code of practice on healthcare-acquired infections. The Government have already said that the new commission’s work on healthcare-acquired infections will start in 2009-10, and therefore there will be some pressure for a code of practice to be consulted on fairly early. As a result of previous legislation, the NHS already has longstanding experience of the development of codes of practice on healthcare-acquired infection but, as this new regulatory body will be in charge of small care homes and so on where there is an incidence of healthcare-acquired infection, it is important to see what is appropriate to them in their work. It is completely different from what is appropriate in a major acute hospital. I want to probe those two issues. I beg to move.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 701 c160-1GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Dental services Care homes Appeals Catering Health Hospitals Health services Finance Human rights Inspections Enforcement Disease control Infectious diseases Health authorities Health education Discrimination General practitioners Learning disability General Social Care Council Private sector NHS Older people Primary care trusts Nutrition Mental health services Midwives MRSA Registration Standards Training Screening Regulation Social services Voluntary work Social workers Healthcare Commission Clostridium Commission for Social Care Inspection Care Quality Commission Care Standards Tribunal
- Legislation
- Health and Social Care Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:25:03 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_469313
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_469313
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_469313