Proceeding contribution from Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 2 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill.
Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill
My Lords, I am not pressing a one-year recommendation. I explained in my opening remarks exactly the reason for my tabling the amendment—that I wanted a timetable. The Minister has reaffirmed the timetable in the White Paper. He also said that in the first few months CMEC would get its act together and start to get cracking, that Section 6 would disappear by the end of the year and that consultation with stakeholders would happen—I assume that he meant during the year, but perhaps not—on moving from one scheme to the current scheme. Is that right?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 702 c39
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Child support Children Compensation Administration Software Child Support Agency Diseases Maintenance Payments Mesothelioma Scotland Departmental coordination Revenue and Customs Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
- Legislation
- Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:51:26 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_475997
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_475997
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_475997