Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 2 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill.


Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill

My Lords, I am all for it being done on a formal basis but, as I said, the Answer received by my honourable friend gave the impression—perhaps it was not intended—that there was no contact at all. In other words, the secondee could not request the information and had to go through someone else in CMEC or the CSA. That cannot be the right way of proceeding. I may have read more into the Answer than was intended, but it occurred to me that it would not be unreasonable to raise the point with the Minister so that he could look at whether the activity that I have described and am fearful of is going on. He very kindly nods, so I assume that he will investigate that. On that basis, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 8 to 18 not moved.] Schedule 7 [Minor and consequential amendments]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c43 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Child support Children Compensation Administration Software Child Support Agency Diseases Maintenance Payments Mesothelioma Scotland Departmental coordination Revenue and Customs Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
Legislation
Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk