Proceeding contribution from John Bercow (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 3 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill.
Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill
My hon. Friend makes his case with his characteristic understatement. The Minister has been very courteous, but the reasoning behind any prospective change in three years' time remains distinctly opaque. Given that any change would be announced—under the affirmative procedure, admittedly—only to a small Committee sitting upstairs, of which most Members of Parliament, let alone most members of the public, would be entirely oblivious, does my hon. Friend not think that the Government ought to state this afternoon on the Floor of the House what criteria would trigger a change?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 476 c657
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Child support Children Appeals Assets Civil servants Correspondence Arrears Child Support Agency Maintenance Payments Non-departmental public bodies Standards Departmental coordination Revenue and Customs Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
- Legislation
- Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:56:04 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_476678
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_476678
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_476678