Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Paul Rowen (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 3 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill.


Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill

I would accept that point if the word ““reasonably”” were in Lords amendment No. 6, but it is in Lords amendment No. 90, which amends information about proceedings available in family courts. They are a matter of record; the information will have been put before the family courts. We cannot introduce any more information, and I honestly do not see why there is a need to include the word ““reasonably””. The information is either there or not there; it can be put before the commission, which can consider it or not. The word ““reasonably”” makes no difference other than to the other side if it wants to avoid that information being made available.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
476 c673 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Child support Children Appeals Assets Civil servants Correspondence Arrears Child Support Agency Maintenance Payments Non-departmental public bodies Standards Departmental coordination Revenue and Customs Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
Legislation
Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk