Proceeding contribution from David Ruffley (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 23 June 2008. It occurred during Legislative debate on Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism.
Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism
The hon. Gentleman also used the word ““charges”” and in fact made a very specific allegation. I do not myself have a view on that, but in this debate it is certainly worth airing the point that the opportunity for this organisation to prove its renunciation of terrorist tactics was not afforded to it by the Government. I genuinely do not know the answer to that, but I am sure that the Minister will want to respond to a quite serious allegation that, for my part, I have no views on. However, as I said, the matter is certainly worth airing.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 478 c103
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crime prevention Appeals Proscribed organisations Terrorism Iran Mujahedin-e Khalq
- Legislation
- Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2008
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:01:07 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_485321
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_485321
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_485321