Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Tony McNulty (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 23 June 2008. It occurred during Legislative debate on Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism.


Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism

It was certainly the assertion of the hon. Member for Southend, West (Mr. Amess) and at least part of the contention of my hon. Friend the Member for Stroud (Mr. Drew), as we will be able to see in Hansard. I am terribly sorry if this disappoints, but it is our duty: we will not hesitate to re-proscribe the PMOI if circumstances change and evidence emerges that it is concerned in terrorism. It is not some reckless cat-and-mouse game, but our duty and responsibility under the legislation. That is all there is to it. To reiterate the point of my right hon. Friend the Chairman of the Home Affairs Committee, the judgment relates solely to the PMOI and has no direct effect on the proscription of other organisations. We have already strengthened our processes for reviewing the proscription of organisations and dealing with applications for their de-proscription, and will of course consider those again in the light of the judgment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
478 c117 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Crime prevention Appeals Proscribed organisations Terrorism Iran Mujahedin-e Khalq
Legislation
Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2008
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk