Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 July 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.
Pensions Bill
The problem is that the Minister has just said that the Government could implement Clause 3, which is the employer duty, without having put in place a pension scheme for personal accounts. The Minister is trying to say that he needs the power to do two things: first, to set the scheme up and, secondly, to amend it. It seems to me that the Minister needs two kinds of formulation in the Bill, not one. For that reason, I would like to test the opinion of the Committee. On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 110A) shall be agreed to? Their Lordships divided: Contents, 136; Not-Contents, 133.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 703 c262-3
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Audit Advisory services Conflict of interests Government assistance Low incomes Public appointments Workplace pensions Pensions Non-departmental public bodies Unfair dismissal Pensions Advisory Service National employment savings trust scheme
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-13 12:49:58 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_489435
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_489435
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_489435