Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 July 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.


Pensions Bill

It is a question of judgment whether the matter is for the Secretary of State or for the trustee corporation, which we hope will be a free-standing organisation of some stature and substance in the pensions community. This is another area where the question is whether the Secretary of State’s role is correct or too intrusive. For every involvement of the Secretary of State, somewhere in the Department for Work and Pensions there will be one or more job descriptions which include that aspect of involvement. One of the things we are concerned about is that we not only create a bureaucracy in the new trustee corporation but leave lots of pegs under which bureaucracy can thrive in Whitehall, which would not be the right outcome. I will consider that in the overall context. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 110F had been withdrawn from the Marshalled List.]


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
703 c276 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Conditions of employment Audit Advisory services Conflict of interests Government assistance Low incomes Public appointments Workplace pensions Pensions Non-departmental public bodies Unfair dismissal Pensions Advisory Service National employment savings trust scheme
Legislation
Pensions Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk