Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 July 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.


Pensions Bill

I invite the Minister to read Schedule 1. It states: "““The Secretary of State and the corporation must also satisfy themselves””." It is one thing for the Secretary of State to be reactively waiting for somebody else to tell him that an issue has arisen—I think that is what the Minister said—or that the trustee corporation chooses to make a communication with the Secretary of State. This is quite prescriptive; it says that the Secretary of State ““must”” satisfy himself, "““from time to time that none of the members has a conflict of interest””." I am trying to find out whether this is a practical proposition in the Bill or just a misguided bit of writing, putting the Secretary of State into every nook and cranny of the corporation.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
703 c325 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Conditions of employment Audit Advisory services Conflict of interests Government assistance Low incomes Public appointments Workplace pensions Pensions Non-departmental public bodies Unfair dismissal Pensions Advisory Service National employment savings trust scheme
Legislation
Pensions Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk