Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 July 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.
Pensions Bill
Doubtless officials will rue the day that two chartered accountants ended up dealing with this Bill. We are interested in quite abstruse matters. I am interested in this because it gets to the heart of whether you can separate the two and how the powers and restrictions in this Bill work in practice. I would be interested in exploring that with the Minister if he could find a way of facilitating it before Report. These are important issues; we should make sure that we understand them. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 112ZA to 112ZC not moved.] Clause 66 agreed to.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 703 c346
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Audit Advisory services Conflict of interests Government assistance Low incomes Public appointments Workplace pensions Pensions Non-departmental public bodies Unfair dismissal Pensions Advisory Service National employment savings trust scheme
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-13 12:49:54 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_489557
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_489557
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_489557