Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Whitaker (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 7 July 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Housing and Regeneration Bill.


Housing and Regeneration Bill

My Lords, in welcoming my noble friend’s amendments, I would like to ask her two questions. Could I first say that I have considerable sympathy with Amendment No. 9, tabled by the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, to create more of a centre of excellence in planning and design skills? I look forward to my noble friend's comments on that proposal. In fact, my question bears on the same point. On my noble friend's Amendment No. 20, I would like to ask her whether the words, "““the effectiveness with which the functions of the local planning authority””" include good design—the local planning authority’s responsibility to ensure that the design is up to standard. Does ““matters relevant to functions”” in subsection (4)(b) of the new clause of her Amendment No. 34 again refer to the importance of good, high quality design?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
703 c530 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access Disability Data protection Compulsory purchase Common land Design Architecture Housing Land Flood control Human rights Grants Learning disability Low incomes Planning permission Powers Loans Ombudsman Standards Sales Regulation Social rented housing Rural areas Urban areas Regional development agencies Homes and Communities Agency
Legislation
Housing and Regeneration Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk