Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 14 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Banking Bill.


Banking Bill

There was a great deal of anxiety, but there was not an enormous exodus by British retail depositors from the banking system. It reflects very well on the common sense of the British people that they were not tempted to move all their money out to Ireland. Not a great deal happened; there were, of course, great problems in the wholesale market as we know, but in the retail market, although some individuals may have moved their money to Ireland, not many did. The reason for that basic common sense is that people understood that they were fully protected. They were fully protected not only by the deposit protection scheme, but by the certain knowledge that if banks went down, the Government would take them over and protect their deposits. However, had the position escalated and there had been a serious run on retail deposits, the British Government would have been forced to give stronger reassurances of the kind that I have just described.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
480 c718 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Compensation Consumers Accountability Bank services Banks Building societies Bank of England Bank notes Finance Financial institutions Insolvency Government assistance Economic situation Equitable Life Assurance Society Protection Mergers Nationalisation Lloyds TSB Monetary Policy Committee Scotland Regulation Halifax Bank of Scotland Financial Services Compensation Scheme National Loans Fund Northern Rock Financial Services Commission Bradford and Bingley
Legislation
Banking Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk