Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Richard Younger-Ross (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 16 October 2008. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Jobs for the Girls: Two Years On.


Jobs for the Girls: Two Years On

I am being asked to come back to the subject matter and I take the point, Mr. Williams. All too often, mothers are forced to accept poorly paid part-time work or to give up work entirely in order to fulfil their role in caring for their children. Eighty per cent. of women are responsible for looking after the children, compared with 17 per cent. of men, which demonstrates my point. Too many women are in jobs beneath their skill level. The right to request flexible working should allow women to fulfil their potential and ensure that business does not lose out on their talent. Flexible working can be very good for business: it can reduce absenteeism, increase recruitment and retention, and reduce stress. It can increase staff well-being, which in turn improves customer service and satisfaction. Fears that flexible working might damage business are unwarranted, because a request can be turned down if a valid business case can be made for refusal. The hon. Member for Hampstead and Highgate (Glenda Jackson) referred to women-owned businesses. The Government state that they are unlocking the talent of women entrepreneurs and that that is at the heart of their new enterprise strategy, which included a £12.5 million capital fund for women-led businesses and a package for the support and promotion of women in business. I have to say to the Minister that £12.5 million is not an awful lot of money in that area.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
480 c351WH 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Adult education Women Employment Equality Pay Professions Public sector Managers Part-time employment Training
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk