Proceeding contribution from David Howarth (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Friday, 17 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning and Energy Bill.
Planning and Energy Bill
Perhaps the best way to interpret the amendment is to see it as an attempt to interpret future enactments in a way that is compatible with this Bill, so that if, by some mischance, future legislation did not refer to the Bill, it would not be taken as an implied repeal of the Bill. This is just a matter of protection against future accidents. Although the hon. Member for Hendon (Mr. Dismore) is correct about the normal way in which we do things, I think that this is a perfectly reasonable amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 480 c1040
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conservation Climate change Environment protection Energy Local government Planning Standards Renewable energy Carbon emissions
- Legislation
- Planning and Energy Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:58:22 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_501054
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_501054
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_501054