Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 22 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Energy Bill.


Energy Bill

My Lords, the Minister eloquently described the size of the problem. That is why the amendment is drafted in the way that it is. As regards the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Oxburgh, there is a lot of uncertainty about these technologies, which is why the schemes we are discussing are demonstration projects. We know that the technologies probably work, but we do not know what efficiencies will be lost in electricity generation through their application. That will have a major effect on the efficiency of power generation from coal in the future. We also know that the nuclear technology the Government are pursuing is characterised by base-load non-variability. That is why coal, or a predictable variable source of energy generation, will be even more important in the future. I say to the noble Lord, Lord O’Neill, that the developed world cannot afford not to pursue urgently a number of these technologies. There is a solution, of which the noble Lord is no doubt aware, and which perhaps ties in with the Minister’s reply in that at a European level the—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c1135 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Climate change Carbon dioxide Coal fired power stations Carbon capture and storage China Licensing Energy Electricity generation Grants Government assistance EU action Germany Offshore structures Scotland Storage Renewable energy Technology Research Wave power Wind power Renewables obligation
Legislation
Energy Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk