Proceeding contribution from Baroness Blackstone (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 30 October 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Education and Skills Bill.
Education and Skills Bill
My Lords, I was not suggesting that someone would be better off unemployed than in a dead-end job. I was saying that, from the point of view of the Bill, they would be better off unemployed because they would get proper education and guided learning rather than low-quality education and guided learning entirely at the workstation. Does my noble friend accept that nothing, but nothing in the amendment suggests that learning at the workplace is not desirable? All it suggests is that, on top of learning at the workstation, there needs to be some learning outside the workplace.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 704 c1725
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Education Children in care Apprentices Employment Health services Enforcement Exemptions Learning disability Local government Qualifications Parents Mental health services Part-time education Training Young people Voluntary work School leaving Specialised diplomas Connexions Service Care leavers
- Legislation
- Education and Skills Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-12-12 12:50:41 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_504800
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_504800
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_504800