Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 10 November 2008. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Social Security (Miscellaneous Amendments) (No. 4) Regulations 2008.


Social Security (Miscellaneous Amendments) (No. 4) Regulations 2008

My Lords, this has been an important debate and I acknowledge the strength of the views expressed around the Chamber. Before I get into some of the detail of the Motion, I refer to the assertion of the noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, about pensioner poverty and the Government's position on it. Frankly, we are not in the mood to take any lectures from his party on that. Our strategy since 1997 has been to target help on the poorest pensioners while providing a solid foundation of support for all. We have a good track record of reducing pensioner poverty. Since 1998, we have lifted 900,000 pensioners out of relative low income. Pensioners are now less likely to be living in poverty, as measured by relative low incomes after housing costs are accounted for, than the population as a whole. If we had continued with the system that we inherited from the noble Lord’s party, we estimate that there could have been about 1.5 million more pensioners in poverty today, and we will be spending about £12 billion more on pensioners in 2008-09 than if the 1997 system had been continued.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
705 c517 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Council tax benefits Appeals Disadvantaged Death Benefits rules Housing benefit Homelessness Evictions Pension credit Pensioners Parliamentary scrutiny Monitoring Low pay Social security benefits Take-up Social Security Advisory Committee
Legislation
Socal Security (Miscellaneous Amendments) (No. 4) Regulations 2008
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk