Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Myners (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Counter-Terrorism Bill.


Counter-Terrorism Bill

My Lords, I believe the right of appeal would effectively freeze the outcome of the intervention. I would prefer to give noble Lords a complete explanation in writing. The noble Lord, Lord Selsdon, gave us an historical perspective. He complimented my noble friend the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform with his former title of President of the Board of Trade. I note that he proposes legislation in that respect. I will leave it to my noble friend to comment in due course on whether he wishes to have either a new or an extra title. The more serious point about examining how the various rights should be reviewed and pulled together into a single document has merit and I will share that with my colleagues in government. The noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, asked when a weights and measures inspector might need to use the powers. I anticipate that it will probably be in connection with the enforcement powers of the OFT but, if I am incorrect, I shall write to the noble Lord and to all those who have participated in this debate. I now ask the noble Lord, Lord Marlesford, to withdraw his amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
705 c940-1 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Administration of justice Detainees Finance Powers of entry Police Public appointments Money laundering Sentencing Terrorism Weapons
Legislation
Counter-terrorism Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk