Proceeding contribution from Huw Irranca-Davies (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 13 January 2009. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Flooding (South Ribble).
Flooding (South Ribble)
My hon. Friend makes an important point. In response to issues that he and others have raised, only last year we reviewed the economic appraisal of agricultural land. It was revised marginally upwards, and we are now considering whether to set specific outcome targets. We actively examine the matter, but we must ensure that there is balance in the prioritisation to ensure that we get the best value for money. We considered the issue only last year, when the appraisal was revised marginally upwards, and we will continue to examine it to see how we can obtain best value for money. The appraisal is based on unit costs, not on absolute benefits, and that should ensure that smaller projects, including rural ones, are considered on an equal footing with larger, often urban projects. Furthermore, as we announced in our response to Sir Michael Pitt's report on the flooding events in summer 2007, we have allocated an initial £5 million to improve property-level resistance to flooding. That will be concentrated on areas that do not stand to benefit from community-level protection schemes. Applications should be made via local authorities, and I am happy to send details of the scheme to my hon. Friend. I understand my hon. Friend's concern about developments without adequate planning for drainage. Water and sewerage companies are not statutory consultees in the planning process because problems with water supply or sewerage are already material considerations in planning cases, and they should be given that weight. I know that developments are proposed in my hon. Friend's constituency, and if a local planning authority believes that a development would give rise to a water supply or sewerage problem, the authority should consult the relevant water company. When such problems cannot be resolved, the local planning authority should refuse permission for new housing. Developers should work closely and at an early stage with water and sewerage companies so that new water supply and disposal infrastructure is timed to coincide with the development that it serves.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 486 c190-1
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Agriculture Flood control Land drainage Environment Agency Floods Local government Ofwat Planning Public expenditure Property development Water charges Repairs and maintenance United Utilities Sewers Religious buildings Lancashire
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-27 13:48:18 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_517887
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_517887
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_517887