Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from William Cash (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 10 February 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Banking Bill.


Banking Bill (Money)

Does the Minister accept that normally the money resolution authorises, in general terms, the expenditure to be authorised and subsequently, as he said, there is an estimate, but that that is not, in itself, a reason for accepting the money resolution? Does he also understand that much of the reason for the Bill's being discussed and voted upon by an unelected Chamber—the other place—is because the Government imposed restrictions on the amount of debate to take place in this House and abrogated to the upper House matters that should properly be dealt with only in this House, because we are elected on behalf of the people?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
487 c1279;487 c1277 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Compensation Codes of practice Accountability Directors Administration Assets Bank services Banks Delegated legislation Bank of England Investment Financial institutions Insolvency Government assistance Financial Services Authority Holding companies Foreign companies Pay Pensions Payments Property transfer Public sector Parliamentary scrutiny Loans Nationalisation Treasury Valuation Northern Rock National Loans Fund Henry VIII clauses Retrospective legislation
Legislation
Banking Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk