Proceeding contribution from Brooks Newmark (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 10 February 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Banking Bill.
Banking Bill (Money)
I acknowledge the sensitivity with which the Minister is trying to approach the issue, and I agree that in normal times semi-annual reporting would probably make sense, but these are extraordinary times. I almost agree with my hon. Friend the Member for Sevenoaks (Mr. Fallon) that there should be monthly reporting, but given the fast-moving times and the vast amount of taxpayers' money put at risk, I feel that quarterly reporting represents a fair compromise. Surely it makes sense. Six months is a huge amount of time, given the dynamics of the financial markets today.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 487 c1297;487 c1295
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Compensation Codes of practice Accountability Directors Administration Assets Bank services Banks Delegated legislation Bank of England Investment Financial institutions Insolvency Government assistance Financial Services Authority Holding companies Foreign companies Pay Pensions Payments Property transfer Public sector Parliamentary scrutiny Loans Nationalisation Treasury Valuation Northern Rock National Loans Fund Henry VIII clauses Retrospective legislation
- Legislation
- Banking Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-13 11:59:02 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_529454
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_529454
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_529454