Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Ian Pearson (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 10 February 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Banking Bill.


Banking Bill (Money)

My understanding of the situation is that that is correct. Let me explain in a bit more detail. As I outlined, the Treasury may take a holding company into temporary public ownership only under the purposes set out in clause 9—that is, if it is"““necessary to resolve or reduce a serious threat to the stability of the financial systems of the United Kingdom””" or"““necessary to protect the public interest””" where financial assistance has been provided. ““Necessary”” is a high test, and as part of that test the Treasury will have to consider whether resolution of the deposit taker would meet the specific conditions set out in clause 9. It is possible to address the purposes specified in clause 9 by taking action in relation to the deposit taker. It would not be necessary to take action in relation to the holding company. That emphasises that action in relation to the holding company is very much a last resort.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
487 c1319;487 c1317 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Compensation Codes of practice Accountability Directors Administration Assets Bank services Banks Delegated legislation Bank of England Investment Financial institutions Insolvency Government assistance Financial Services Authority Holding companies Foreign companies Pay Pensions Payments Property transfer Public sector Parliamentary scrutiny Loans Nationalisation Treasury Valuation Northern Rock National Loans Fund Henry VIII clauses Retrospective legislation
Legislation
Banking Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk