Proceeding contribution from Ian Pearson (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 10 February 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Banking Bill.
Banking Bill (Money)
I understand the hon. Gentleman's point, but the proposals in the amendments strike the right balance and provide a high level of assurance about the Government's future actions. As we have repeatedly said during the Bill's passage, we hope that we will never have to use the powers in question, because we do not want banks to fail. However, we need powers to address the issue of bank holding companies. Our stabilisation objectives might not be met effectively if we retained only the power to act on a licensed deposit taker such as a bank. I believe that the hon. Gentleman accepts the general thesis that those powers are required, and I hope that the House will agree to the amendments.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 487 c1323;487 c1321
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Compensation Codes of practice Accountability Directors Administration Assets Bank services Banks Delegated legislation Bank of England Investment Financial institutions Insolvency Government assistance Financial Services Authority Holding companies Foreign companies Pay Pensions Payments Property transfer Public sector Parliamentary scrutiny Loans Nationalisation Treasury Valuation Northern Rock National Loans Fund Henry VIII clauses Retrospective legislation
- Legislation
- Banking Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-13 11:58:48 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_529505
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_529505
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_529505