Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 February 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill [HL].


Health Bill [HL]

I agree with all that the noble Baroness said as regards incorporating a duty to have regard to the handbook. My Amendment 8 is designed to meet that purpose. If anything, it is more important that people should be under an obligation to abide by the handbook than by the constitution in isolation because, of its very nature, as the noble Baroness indicated, the constitution is expressed only in headline terms rather than in terms of the explanatory substance in the handbook. We need to remember that the handbook not only defines but, in some cases, limits the rights and pledges set out in the constitution. If the duty to have regard to the constitution is not accompanied by an equivalent duty in relation to the handbook, we are left wondering what status the handbook has. At the moment, it does not appear to have any at all. In purely practical terms, we want to be certain that people employed by the NHS operate with a clear understanding of what the constitution actually means rather than what they think it means. That is the central point at issue here.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
708 c20GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disability Devolved matters Accountability Carers Administration Costs Health services Finance Expenditure EU law Health professions Local government NHS Patients Public consultation Staff Patients' rights Mental health services Standards Training Trade unions Research Social services Reorganisation Switzerland Local involvement networks
Legislation
Health Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk