Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hanningfield (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 3 March 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [HL].


Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [HL]

Another point came up during the passage of the transport Bill. I approve of Integrated Transport Authorities, and the Government agreed that they should be composed mainly of elected members, but we would be totally against having road charging imposed upon a county that did not want it. If counties want it, that is fine. They can have a referendum. It would be wrong to have a majority of an integrated body voting for road charging within a local authority that did not want it. That is what concerns us: losing the local democracy of that authority. It is up to that authority to choose the various things it wants. We do not want anything created which could impose it upon an authority that was against it.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
708 c274GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Contracts Courts Construction Cooperation Bureaucracy Civic dignitaries Commercial law Finance Industry Insolvency Functions Legal costs Economic planning District councils Local government Local government finance Planning Public consultation Public transport Passenger transport executives Standards Transport Small businesses Regeneration Local area agreements Economic prosperity boards
Legislation
Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk