Proceeding contribution from Lord Hanningfield (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 3 March 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [HL].
Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [HL]
Both the Minister and the noble Lord, Lord Smith of Leigh, made the argument for why Essex should not be in the eastern region: the travel-to-work patterns and so on relate to London and the south-east, not to Norfolk. That is another point, and I will take note of it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 708 c275GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Contracts Courts Construction Cooperation Bureaucracy Civic dignitaries Commercial law Finance Industry Insolvency Functions Legal costs Economic planning District councils Local government Local government finance Planning Public consultation Public transport Passenger transport executives Standards Transport Small businesses Regeneration Local area agreements Economic prosperity boards
- Legislation
- Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-02-21 15:18:56 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_533542
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_533542
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_533542