Proceeding contribution from Lord Greenway (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 9 March 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL].
Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]
I have enormous sympathy with this amendment, although it contains a number of difficulties. We can all immediately think of half a dozen wonderful seascapes that should be preserved. Anyone who lives near the sea would feel that their view of the sea is of a seascape that should be preserved. The Government and other noble Lords will be aware that the proposed offshore wind farm site off the Jurassic Coast in Dorset has been moved nearer Poole. I am not certain whether that will please the rich residents of Sandbanks. From another point of view, it could be argued that the seascape from the Isle of Wight looking down over the Needles is particularly wonderful. How will that stand if a wind farm appears in the distance?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 708 c1038
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Devolved matters Conservation Coastal areas Cultural heritage National landscapes Environment protection Navigation Planning Public consultation Maps National parks Scotland Sustainable development Wales Shipping Seas and oceans Science Sites of special scientific interest Hydrography Natural England Marine Management Organisation Marine conservation zones
- Legislation
- Marine and Coastal Access Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 09:58:07 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_535931
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_535931
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_535931