Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 16 March 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL].


Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]

The noble Lord, Lord Greenway, must tread carefully. He will remember that I have had to answer a few questions on how cameras work and whether they are revenue raising, and he will recall how much I denied that assertion. Local authorities were not beneficiaries as regards that form of transport. The Government agree with the noble Lord that the capital expenditure involved in the purchase of a patrol boat is substantial. The limited additional resources that the conservation authorities can get from permits should not to be posited as a possible fund from which capital expenditures of such magnitude could ever be envisaged. That is why I return to the Government’s position that funding is the responsibility of the local authorities.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
709 c92 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Devolved matters Conservation Coastal areas Crown lands and estates Byelaws Devon Crown Estate Finance Fisheries Environment protection Expenditure Fishing limits Inshore fishing Environment Agency Fishing gear Local government Local government finance Public appointments National Assembly for Wales Nature conservation Marine animals Scotland Regulation Sustainable development Wales Seas and oceans Wildlife Shellfish Natural England Marine Management Organisation Inshore fisheries and conservation authorities
Legislation
Marine and Coastal Access Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk