Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Dubs (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 April 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health Bill [HL].


Health Bill [HL]

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend for that explanation. What the Government seek to achieve and what I seek to achieve are clearly the same. The question is whether I share the Government’s confidence that, if the matter were to be put to the test of the House of Lords in its judicial capacity, the House would come down on the side of the Government or take the same view as it did in the YL case. I am not a lawyer: I am not qualified to answer some of the detailed legal questions, but my understanding is that there is a little doubt about that. If there is no doubt, that is fine and I hope that I am proved wrong. However, given the persuasive nature of my noble friend's arguments, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 24 withdrawn. Amendment 25 not moved.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
710 c200 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Accountability Appeals Consent to medical treatment Carers Costs Delegated legislation Contamination Blood Health services Finance Fees and charges Education Innovation Health professions Health authorities Haemophilia Local government NHS Medical treatments Patients Low incomes Ministerial powers Parking Payments Parliamentary scrutiny Patients' rights Standards Training Research CJD Care Quality Commission NHS constitution
Legislation
Health Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk