Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Cathcart (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 5 May 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL].


Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]

My Lords, I thank the Minister for setting out the Government’s position so clearly. I do not believe that any of us who have contributed to this debate are very far apart. We all want to see the MMO in the Bill as a statutory adviser/consultee. Where the IPC does not take the MMO’s advice and recommendations, it should publish the reasons why not. I thank all those who have contributed, and I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Young, for flattering me with her disapproval of my amendment and choosing the other amendment in this group. We are all nearly there, though. With that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 49 withdrawn. Clause 24: Advice, assistance and training facilities Amendments 50 and 51 not moved.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
710 c500 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Devolved matters Conservation Coastal areas Archaeology Devolution Cultural heritage Fisheries Licensing Electricity generation Fishing vessels Legislative competence Insolvency Local government Public appointments Planning Ports Power stations National Assembly for Wales Nature conservation Scotland Sustainable development Wales Scottish Parliament Renewable energy Seas and oceans Territorial waters Science Seals Marine Management Organisation
Legislation
Marine and Coastal Access Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk