Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from James Paice (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Friday, 8 May 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Green Energy (Definition and Promotion) Bill.


Green Energy (Definition and Promotion) Bill

I happily accept the Minister's comments, but that is the purpose of the consultation, and if the conclusion of that consultation is that landowners should have more freedom, it would seem that all the objectives had been met. I strongly suspect that the Minister is right that there would not be huge support for a completely free and open approach. The point reiterated in the clauses on domestic and non-domestic premises is that if we are to encourage microgeneration, we may have to accept some relaxation of the planning rules. We can all debate the extent of the relaxation, but the schedule, although applying only to wind turbines, is extremely relevant. I hope that the Minister and the Government will understand it and leave it in the Bill. Let us consider the technology of the mobile phone industry as an example. When I first entered the House, those with mobile phones had to carry a car battery around with them. The advance in technology resulted partly from the fact that the then Conservative Government—I was glad to be a member—allowed some relaxation in the planning legislation governing the construction of masts.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
492 c475 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Biofuels Environment protection Energy Planning permission Microgeneration Sustainable development Renewable energy
Legislation
Green Energy (Definition and Promotion) Bill 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk