Proceeding contribution from Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 12 May 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL].
Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]
My Lords, I thank the Minister for that response and particularly for his very positive reply on Amendment 100. I hope that it will be possible to tie in the two principal clauses to make the matter clearer and indeed to make the Government’s intention clear in the Bill. I understand the Minister’s argument regarding exemptions. Indeed, the noble Lord, Lord Greenway, reinforced the need to avoid pettifogging, bureaucratic processes. However, somehow or another, we need to find a way of ensuring that repeated activity can be properly monitored so that environmental damage can be noted. If that is the purpose of the consultation, we are very happy, and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 100 withdrawn. Amendment 101 not moved.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 710 c976
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Devolved matters Common fisheries policy Coal Coastal areas Fisheries Licensing Environment protection Exemptions Electric cables Local government Oil Planning Mining Nature conservation Minerals Scotland Wales Repairs and maintenance Shipping Seas and oceans Marine Management Organisation Marine conservation zones
- Legislation
- Marine and Coastal Access Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-15 13:29:42 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_556847
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_556847
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_556847