Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 12 May 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL].
Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]
My Lords, I speak to this amendment only to respond to the Minister’s observations in the course of the debate that we have recently undertaken. Given the very firm way in which the Minister stated that Clause 114(1) ineluctably required the contents of my amendment to be respected, I am surprised that he is not prepared to make that crystal clear in the Bill. However, given his statement, I recognise that were there to be any doubts raised about that, and were litigation to be ensued, the statements that the Minister has made in your Lordships’ House this evening would clearly be admissible under the doctrine of Pepper and Hart. I am comforted by that reflection. Amendment 113ZA not moved.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 710 c1034
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Devolved matters Common fisheries policy Coal Coastal areas Fisheries Licensing Environment protection Exemptions Electric cables Local government Oil Planning Mining Nature conservation Minerals Scotland Wales Repairs and maintenance Shipping Seas and oceans Marine Management Organisation Marine conservation zones
- Legislation
- Marine and Coastal Access Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-15 13:30:10 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_556944
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_556944
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_556944