Proceeding contribution from Lord Strathclyde (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 11 June 2009. It occurred during Debate on Constitutional Renewal.
Constitutional Renewal
My Lords, my point about the Supreme Court is a little hard to give because it is not yet in existence. My fear is that a new Supreme Court over the road in Parliament Square will find itself clashing increasingly with Parliament; that, as it has been removed from Parliament, we will see the growth of judge-made law rather than Parliament-made law. We already have an example of that on the role of privacy, which has been decided not by Parliament but by the courts. That may be a good thing or a bad thing—I make no comment—but it has been decided by judges, not by Parliament.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 711 c786
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Codes of practice Accountability Discipline Conduct Allowances Devolution Civil service British constitution Elections Freedom of information House of Lords House of Commons Electoral systems Misconduct Ministerial powers Members Public consultation Parliamentary scrutiny Peers Special advisers Regulation Reform Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:00:56 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_566103
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_566103
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_566103