Proceeding contribution from Lord West of Spithead (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 October 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Policing and Crime Bill.
Policing and Crime Bill
In the hypothetical case that I gave, I think that you would not allow the person in the street at all. There would have to be some negotiation on mitigation if half his family lived there. But if all his previous behaviour leads one to believe that he is a violent individual and between the two gangs huge animosity has built up in which there is a culture of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth—it is rather like the tribal uplands in Afghanistan, which has the same sort of flavour—for his own good, the safety of the people on the other side and the public, he should not be allowed to visit that area. Such detail will be dealt with as it comes up.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 713 c172
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Codes of practice Crime prevention Appeals Crime Alcoholic drinks Crimes of violence Anti-social behaviour Bottles Licensing Harassment Licensed premises Injunctions Glass Local government Police Powers Public places Packaging Prices Plastics Sales Young people Anti-social behaviour orders
- Legislation
- Policing and Crime Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:14:59 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_583578
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_583578
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_583578