Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Freud (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 25 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Child Poverty Bill.


Child Poverty Bill

I thank the Minister for that response. However, the context in which we are discussing transparency has changed dramatically over the past six months, with all the media and public concern about payment for public office. Clearly, that concern has affected Members of both legislative Houses. To the extent that one can make any new bodies utterly transparent in the way that I am endeavouring to do, it can only be good for that body. It will come to be seen as a higher requirement generally in public service. I anticipate that this is a trend that we will see in the years to come as a direct result of what has happened with expenses over the past year. With those observations, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 25 withdrawn. Schedule 1 agreed. Clause 8 : UK strategies Clause 8 : UK strategies Amendment 26 not moved. Amendment 27 Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
716 c245GC 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Conditions of employment Alcoholic drinks Disadvantaged Costs Finance Families Drugs Misconduct Low incomes Pay Membership Public appointments Poverty Minimum wage Misuse Nutrition Lone parents OECD countries Social security benefits Welfare tax credits Research Unemployment Self-employed UNICEF Child Poverty Commission Public health
Legislation
Child Poverty Bill 2008-09 to 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk