Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 25 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Child Poverty Bill.


Child Poverty Bill

I acknowledge that, but we are talking about earning, and if minimum income standards were available today and if there were a government figure, that would demonstrate clearly that the minimum wage was not enough to reach the 60 per cent. That is a worry as well in terms of where the Government and their policy are going. This has been a good debate and I undertake to go away and think about this matter. The Government must start making it clear that the strategies will be fully supported by all the measurement methodologies available. I for one will certainly be disappointed if the commission that we are setting up does not look at minimum income standards urgently, with a view to informing some of this policy. I have not given up hope that we will somehow be able to get this insinuated somewhere into the Bill. I am grateful to colleagues and this has been a useful debate. The Committee will, I hope, return to it at a later stage. I am grateful to the Minister and beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 27 withdrawn. Amendment 28 Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
716 c262GC 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Conditions of employment Alcoholic drinks Disadvantaged Costs Finance Families Drugs Misconduct Low incomes Pay Membership Public appointments Poverty Minimum wage Misuse Nutrition Lone parents OECD countries Social security benefits Welfare tax credits Research Unemployment Self-employed UNICEF Child Poverty Commission Public health
Legislation
Child Poverty Bill 2008-09 to 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk