Proceeding contribution from Lord Freud (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 25 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Child Poverty Bill.
Child Poverty Bill
I was not arguing that. There is a difference between the absolute figures and the equivalence figures. I am just quoting a well researched figure from the Centre for Social Justice, which finds that the difference between being apart and being together is £1,336 if you are a low-income family, with all the discouragement that that has for family formation and families staying together. You can—and some people do—argue that the financial effects have no impact on behaviour. I find that suspicious. Usually financial effects on that scale—we are talking about a reasonable scale—will influence behaviour, particularly when there is this very high level of break-up in cohabiting families with low incomes.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 716 c269-70GC
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Children Conditions of employment Alcoholic drinks Disadvantaged Costs Finance Families Drugs Misconduct Low incomes Pay Membership Public appointments Poverty Minimum wage Misuse Nutrition Lone parents OECD countries Social security benefits Welfare tax credits Research Unemployment Self-employed UNICEF Child Poverty Commission Public health
- Legislation
- Child Poverty Bill 2008-09 to 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:06:13 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614098
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614098
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614098